Raw is good, but what about 'Structure' ? AFAIU, it is the State/Structure that is used for the tree view, right ?
On 03 Oct 2014, at 22:50, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, I like "Raw". Thanks for the ping:). > > Anyone against "Raw"? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:36 PM, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it be possible to have 'raw' instead of state? > > Stef > > >> I'll make a new version to integrate. >> >> >> Cheers, >> Andrei >> >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >> Done! >> >> Doru >> >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 03 Oct 2014, at 15:23, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Great. I checked it quickly and it looks great. I added you to the Moose >> > team. Could you please commit directly in the repo? >> >> Done, you'll have to merge my version since it is two commits behind. >> >> > Doru >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I made my first additions/changes to GT-Inspector: >> > >> > === >> > Name: GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.54 >> > Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe >> > Time: 3 October 2014, 3:03:17.252107 pm >> > UUID: 853cfe8d-314c-4eac-ad67-8c6eff2b4f83 >> > Ancestors: GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-TudorGirba.53 >> > >> > Customized GT-Inspector for Integer, Float and Character >> > === >> > >> > MCZ attached: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > I made it so that 'State' shows slots only (if any) and takes precedence. >> > >> > I added an 'Integer' tab to Integer with decimal, hex, octal, binary and >> > optional character aspects. >> > >> > I added a 'Float' tab to Float with (binary, base 2) significant and >> > exponent (self = significant * (2 ** exponent)) [the old sign field was >> > not needed since significant is signed already), while making the 'State' >> > show the 2 indexed slots (which is more correct IMHO). >> > >> > I added a 'Character' tab with self, codepoint and unicode aspects. >> > >> > Obviously this has to be iterated upon. I am already very happy that I >> > could figure out how to do this. Much more from the old Eye inspectors >> > will follow. >> > >> > Sven >> > >> > PS1: Implementing this, I sense that we might need an option so that a >> > field can show some label for its value, while clicking further on it >> > would continue on something else (obviously related), differently field by >> > field. >> > >> > PS2: Is is necessary/useful for the States fields in >> > #gtInspectorVariableValuePairs to be a Set instead of something that >> > preserves the order ? >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > www.tudorgirba.com >> > >> > "Every thing has its own flow" >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >> > > > > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "Every thing has its own flow"
