Yes, essentially, the State view shows you the tree of objects like you had in the explorer. But, I like State better than Structure :)
But, I also like Raw because it goes in comparison with the rest of the presentations of that object: this is the raw presentation, but the others are more refined and specific :). Doru On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: > 'Structure' is large :P > > > On 04 Oct 2014, at 08:58, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Raw is good, but what about 'Structure' ? > > AFAIU, it is the State/Structure that is used for the tree view, right ? > > > > On 03 Oct 2014, at 22:50, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Yes, I like "Raw". Thanks for the ping:). > >> > >> Anyone against "Raw"? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Doru > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:36 PM, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Would it be possible to have 'raw' instead of state? > >> > >> Stef > >> > >> > >>> I'll make a new version to integrate. > >>> > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Andrei > >>> > >>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Done! > >>> > >>> Doru > >>> > >>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> On 03 Oct 2014, at 15:23, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Great. I checked it quickly and it looks great. I added you to the > Moose team. Could you please commit directly in the repo? > >>> > >>> Done, you'll have to merge my version since it is two commits behind. > >>> > >>>> Doru > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> I made my first additions/changes to GT-Inspector: > >>>> > >>>> === > >>>> Name: GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.54 > >>>> Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe > >>>> Time: 3 October 2014, 3:03:17.252107 pm > >>>> UUID: 853cfe8d-314c-4eac-ad67-8c6eff2b4f83 > >>>> Ancestors: GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-TudorGirba.53 > >>>> > >>>> Customized GT-Inspector for Integer, Float and Character > >>>> === > >>>> > >>>> MCZ attached: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I made it so that 'State' shows slots only (if any) and takes > precedence. > >>>> > >>>> I added an 'Integer' tab to Integer with decimal, hex, octal, binary > and optional character aspects. > >>>> > >>>> I added a 'Float' tab to Float with (binary, base 2) significant and > exponent (self = significant * (2 ** exponent)) [the old sign field was not > needed since significant is signed already), while making the 'State' show > the 2 indexed slots (which is more correct IMHO). > >>>> > >>>> I added a 'Character' tab with self, codepoint and unicode aspects. > >>>> > >>>> Obviously this has to be iterated upon. I am already very happy that > I could figure out how to do this. Much more from the old Eye inspectors > will follow. > >>>> > >>>> Sven > >>>> > >>>> PS1: Implementing this, I sense that we might need an option so that > a field can show some label for its value, while clicking further on it > would continue on something else (obviously related), differently field by > field. > >>>> > >>>> PS2: Is is necessary/useful for the States fields in > #gtInspectorVariableValuePairs to be a Set instead of something that > preserves the order ? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> www.tudorgirba.com > >>>> > >>>> "Every thing has its own flow" > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> www.tudorgirba.com > >>> > >>> "Every thing has its own flow" > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> www.tudorgirba.com > >> > >> "Every thing has its own flow" > > > > > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
