Yes, I like "Raw". Thanks for the ping:). Anyone against "Raw"?
Cheers, Doru On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:36 PM, stepharo <[email protected]> wrote: > Would it be possible to have 'raw' instead of state? > > Stef > > > I'll make a new version to integrate. > > > Cheers, > Andrei > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Done! >> >> Doru >> >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 03 Oct 2014, at 15:23, Tudor Girba <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > Great. I checked it quickly and it looks great. I added you to the >>> Moose team. Could you please commit directly in the repo? >>> >>> Done, you'll have to merge my version since it is two commits behind. >>> >>> > Doru >>> > >>> > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > I made my first additions/changes to GT-Inspector: >>> > >>> > === >>> > Name: GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-SvenVanCaekenberghe.54 >>> > Author: SvenVanCaekenberghe >>> > Time: 3 October 2014, 3:03:17.252107 pm >>> > UUID: 853cfe8d-314c-4eac-ad67-8c6eff2b4f83 >>> > Ancestors: GT-InspectorExtensions-Core-TudorGirba.53 >>> > >>> > Customized GT-Inspector for Integer, Float and Character >>> > === >>> > >>> > MCZ attached: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I made it so that 'State' shows slots only (if any) and takes >>> precedence. >>> > >>> > I added an 'Integer' tab to Integer with decimal, hex, octal, binary >>> and optional character aspects. >>> > >>> > I added a 'Float' tab to Float with (binary, base 2) significant and >>> exponent (self = significant * (2 ** exponent)) [the old sign field was not >>> needed since significant is signed already), while making the 'State' show >>> the 2 indexed slots (which is more correct IMHO). >>> > >>> > I added a 'Character' tab with self, codepoint and unicode aspects. >>> > >>> > Obviously this has to be iterated upon. I am already very happy that I >>> could figure out how to do this. Much more from the old Eye inspectors will >>> follow. >>> > >>> > Sven >>> > >>> > PS1: Implementing this, I sense that we might need an option so that a >>> field can show some label for its value, while clicking further on it would >>> continue on something else (obviously related), differently field by field. >>> > >>> > PS2: Is is necessary/useful for the States fields in >>> #gtInspectorVariableValuePairs to be a Set instead of something that >>> preserves the order ? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > www.tudorgirba.com >>> > >>> > "Every thing has its own flow" >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> www.tudorgirba.com >> >> "Every thing has its own flow" >> > > > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Every thing has its own flow"
