Le 27/08/2016 à 13:18, stepharo a écrit :
> 
> 
> YES!!!
> 
> Do you know how Settings works?
> We can adapt it this way.

When I improved the deployment of Synectique Tools I asked to get a
simple way to disable Spotter via a setting but I got as answer "No
because you can do it by removing a global shortcut so it is not needed.".

People in companies don't have the time to learn how shortcuts work and
how to remove one without impacting something else. And they don't have
the time to check Spotter code to know how it is call.

If the image is able to have a deployment mode then I don't care how
Spotter is disabled (setting or removing a shortcut). But for now we
don't have it. :)

> I mean the User approach that Benjmain proposed and was pushed in Pharo
> was not good because it was not modular. Now each part of the system
> should be
> defined in way that it can be set just as a setting.
> We should not have
> 
> World    ....
>         User current = ifTrue
> 
> But
> 
> World use: userSetting
> 
> and World should handle it.
> There is way more to do :)
> When you deploy on linux you should be able to say beSilent to the
> system (do not write on places that you cannot).
> Valentin works on it and we should continue
> 
> Stef
> 

The fact that there is much more to do is the main reason for Pharo to
do it and not the developer. The developer cannot know all the system
and will not be able to protect the code of his company well because he
will forget something as to disable ctrl+o+p (or he is a god developer!
But everyone is not).

This is a large thing to do, so it would be cool that everyone keep that
in mind to allow it little by little (as with the work of Valentin).

-- 
Cyril Ferlicot

http://www.synectique.eu

165 Avenue Bretagne
Lille 59000 France

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to