hi jeff and all
the auction seller is domenic dibenardo
not sure if he used shills or not  
it does seem high for that machine with the reproducer it has 
it should have the earlier one
best to all
zono
From [email protected]  Wed Jan 17 06:24:12 2007
From: [email protected] (Jeffry Young, D.O.)
Date: Wed Jan 17 06:24:25 2007
Subject: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

I guess it just means that I should increase the insurance coverage on
mine! I appreciate everyone's comments on this string! It will be
interesting to see if ebay ever reverses this policy. It has certainly
not slowed the 23 bids on the Zonophone A!

Jeff Young
Wisconsin

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 5:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

hi jeff and all
the auction seller is domenic dibenardo
not sure if he used shills or not  
it does seem high for that machine with the reproducer it has 
it should have the earlier one
best to all
zono
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
From [email protected]  Wed Jan 17 08:03:38 2007
From: [email protected] (Rich)
Date: Wed Jan 17 08:03:51 2007
Subject: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

As eBay only provides a 30 day look back and there is no way to find the IP 
address of the seller and 
bidders from the information provided by eBay, how does this recent change - 
"... makes it harder to 
detect fraudulent bidding too,...".  The only thing that I have seen is 
multiple bids from the same 
individual.  That just looks dumb to me.  To make shill bidding work there 
needs to be a minimum of 2 
bidders, at least one of which is the shill.  How are you going to RELIABLY 
detect this?  If is is poorly 
done it is obvious but if it is done right you will never know.  The only way 
to tell is to have the IP of 
the seller and all bidders then if the bids from two bidders or the seller and 
one bidder originate from 
the same IP you would be correct in suspecting something.

In my opinion this is a tempest in a very small tea pot.  I find the highly 
inflated "shipping and 
handling" charges much more egregious and revealing as to the ethics of the 
seller.

Rich



On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:48:30 -0800 (PST), Donald Dellmann wrote:

>Generally in the past, a "private auction" was used for items where it was 
>likely that people wouldn't 
want their friends to know what they were buying.  Prime examples would be 
items of a sexual or 
fetishistic nature, or unusual items out of the "mainstream" of society.  
Applying it to auctions in 
general does protect bidders, I can see eBay's point, but it also makes it 
harder to detect fraudulent 
bidding too, so I have to lean towards the side of opposition to the new policy.
>   
>  Don

>Daniel Melvin <[email protected]> wrote:
>  I have always avoided auctions that hide bidders. I agree with Jeff's 
>suspicions. I just don't trust sellers that hide things. It just feels 
>wrong. I suppose many people have had OK transactions this way. It's not for 
>me though.

>Dan

>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: 
>To: 

>Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 5:57 PM
>Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!


>>
>> In a message dated 1/16/2007 4:13:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
>> [email protected] writes:
>>
>> Has anyone bid, or won anything with these bidder identification 
>> protected
>> auctions? The seller of the Zonophone-A is doing that with that particular
>> auction.
>>
>>
>>
>> ====================
>> eBay has always had an option for keeping bidders private, but this is not
>> the case here. Recently eBay instituted a new policy whereby anything that 
>> tops
>> $200 becomes "protected." It's not the seller's choice. Instead of showing
>> bidder IDs it shows "Bidder 1, " "Bidder 2" etc. This is an attempt to 
>> combat
>> rampant fraud since so many scammers are sending fake "second chance" 
>> notices
>> to underbidders. By hiding bidders on higher-priced items they hope to 
>> cut
>> down on these scams. It will also prevent people from offering similar 
>> items
>> to underbidders by private message.
>>
>> On the bid history page you can view some statistics on the bidders. 
>> Perhaps
>> the most telling is the one that shows what percent of the bidder's total
>> bid activity is with the particular seller. In the Zonophone auction, for
>> example, the current high bidder has 42% of activity with the seller. 
>> That's
>> certainly very high. It also shows the categories the bidder has been 
>> active in,
>> so it's very easy to see if a person who spends most of his time buying
>> Christmas ornaments is suddenly a player on high-end collector 
>> phonographs.
>>
>> The new system is far from ideal, and I confess I liked to see what other
>> people were bidding on. But by the same token, I never liked airing my 
>> own bid
>> history publicly so I guess I'm a hypocrite at heart! Overall I think 
>> this
>> new system will have more pros than cons. (And it will hopefully stifle 
>> some of
>> the con artists, pun intended....)
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Rene Rondeau
>> _______________________________________________
>> Phono-L mailing list
>> http://phono-l.oldcrank.org 

>_______________________________________________
>Phono-L mailing list
>http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

>_______________________________________________
>Phono-L mailing list
>http://phono-l.oldcrank.org


Reply via email to