[PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-QA] ctype function (re?)naming

[Zak Greant]

Andi wrote:
> At 05:05 PM 3/6/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
> >Andi wrote:
> >
> >[snip]
> >I don't have any complaints or helpful comments on what was above this.
> >
> > > 3) Why change the imap ones to not include underscores? Looks as if
you
> >did
> > > the reverse here :)
> >
> >Removing the underscores was the choice that meant the least amount of
> >change for the extension. :)
>
> I think it's a wrong choice. If we're moving to a standard system which
> puts underscores in key places of the name, we shouldn't remove them from
imap.

    I certainly don't have *any* problems adding underscores. :)  Removing
the
    underscores was my best attempt to be moderate. If we can get agreement
    on moving imap towards the naming convention, then I am more than happy
    to go along!

    --zak


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]