At 11:28 PM 3/6/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
>Andi wrote:
> > At 05:05 PM 3/6/2001 -0700, Zak Greant wrote:
> > >Andi wrote:
> > >
> > >[snip]
> > >I don't have any complaints or helpful comments on what was above this.
> > >
> > > > 3) Why change the imap ones to not include underscores? Looks as if
>you
> > >did
> > > > the reverse here :)
> > >
> > >Removing the underscores was the choice that meant the least amount of
> > >change for the extension. :)
> >
> > I think it's a wrong choice. If we're moving to a standard system which
> > puts underscores in key places of the name, we shouldn't remove them from
>imap.
>
> I certainly don't have *any* problems adding underscores. :) Removing
>the
> underscores was my best attempt to be moderate. If we can get agreement
> on moving imap towards the naming convention, then I am more than happy
> to go along!
I think the Status Quo is better than removing them. So we should decide to
either fix them or to leave them the way they are.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
