At 21:48 9/7/2001, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
> > besides that i can actually think of one or two usages for
> > > a scanner in PHP which is not QPL. for exacle that reason the
> > > your DOMXML sample is void - if we had a better DOMXML under
> > > the same license we would use the better one.
> >
> > Can you share your thoughts as to how exactly GPL scanner built into
> PHP in
> > an odd way would improve your world for the better? Remember, the scanner
> > is already there, you can use it if you think it's useful. We're arguing
> > on whether it should be plugged into PHP in a backwards way or not.
>
> the current sources say it's under the PHP-License.
Ok, in which case, can you share your thoughts as to how exactly
PHP-license scanner built into PHP in an odd way would improve your world
for the better? Remember, the scanner is already there, you can use it if
you think it's useful. We're arguing on whether it should be plugged into
PHP in a backwards way or not.
Zeev
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
