On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Bj�rn Schotte wrote:
>Hi,
>
>* Jani Taskinen wrote:
>> What do you mean with 'better release management' ?
>
>Extensions that get broken from one minor release to
>another minor release is not a very good thing.
That's a problem with the lack of proper QA.
And also the lack of 'feeling of ownership' over an
extension. Some extensions have been abandoned by
their initial developer and haven't been picked up
by anyone else..
>> >more complexity to the language itself.
>> Why would making PHP more complex be a good thing?
>
>Because not every web designer and semi-programmer could
>then work with PHP - this lacks the image of PHP. ("PHP
>ist only good for guestbooks and very small applications.",
>most people think)
Any examples? Is PHP too easy to use? :)
I find that hard swallow. It's one of the main features
why I am using PHP. I'm not clever enough to learn
anything complex. :)
That is why I myself would like to see PHP used everywhere. :)
--Jani
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
