On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Eric Butera <eric.but...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Rixham <nrix...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Kyle Terry wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Rixham <nrix...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Eric Butera wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry <k...@kyleterry.com> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle < > >>>>> edmund.her...@student.kit.edu> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham <nrix...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> sounds like a starting point. and the starting point imho, > interfaces > >>>>>>> and abstracts, then implementations. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> can i gather that this is a postive response and a few interested > >>>>>>> parties? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> if so important things like is this discussed on this list or > where, > >>>>>>> need > >>>>>>> for server space and svn? etc scope for a user group / list @ php > on > >>>>>>> this? > >>>>>>> or what..? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> + all monkeys no organ grinder approach, no release until all happy > >>>>>>> (negating obvious trouble makers) and maybe a release manager for > >>>>>>> svn. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> more thoughts please > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up > SVN, > >>>>>> webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used by > 4-5 > >>>>>> people. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> Well, I use Comcast and they put a 250gig cap per month of their > >>>>> residential > >>>>> customer, so my server can only be used temporarily if we need one. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> Guys there's plenty of free "open source" hosted svn/git servers. Do > >>>> a google search. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> lol and sourceforge [doh]; that way if anything takes off natural user > >>> base > >>> and integrated promotion "most active" - possibly with aid of tony :D > >>> > >>> > >> http://gitorious.org/ > >> > > > > open to debate; my preference for now goes to sourceforge as it's all > there > > including space with php support; proven you know. However i like new > > projects as well so open but overall +1 goes to whatever gets us up and > > running with the least time spent. > > > > and on the other side.. to open things up > > > > interface Object { > > } > > > > or > > > > abstract class Object { > > } > > > > or > > > > class Object { > > } > > > > nothing else for now: > > > > reason: > > to address the current and forseable lack of function(object $obj) in > php; > > in addition to allow future scope for any common to all methods (or any > > implementation of this to have) > > > > i guess first is it a good idea to have any of the above and to address > > this, then next if so which? > > > > That needs to be prefixed. Or maybe namespaces if you're targeting > 5.3? It'd suck to have a lot of code using such a thing only to > become a reserved word. > I doubt we are going to use the word Object. haha. -- Kyle Terry | www.kyleterry.com
