At 1:10 PM -0700 5/4/10, Daevid Vincent wrote:
Well, here is the one I'm using. I ended up just writing one (again!)
http://www.daevid.com/content/examples/snippets.php :: "Production
I know you don't mean it, but you certainly know how to piss people
off. You are not going to like what I have to say, but please accept
the following as constructive criticism with no personal intent meant.
The site fails W3C CSS validation with 96 errors.
The site fails W3C HTML validation with 92 errors and 9 warnings.
I have not run into a site like this since before the turn of this
century where we had browser wars. The problem isn't just with my
browser, but many more as you can see here:
The page (not addressing the entire site) is riddled with embedded
I haven't even addressed accessibility, graceful degradation, or
separation of content from presentation from behavior all of which
are the goals of "best practices" sites -- and all of which this site
My advice, which I realize that you didn't ask for, is if you want to
provide something of substance, then do so for all and not just the
privileged elite who think they are the leading edge with this type
of "gimmick" nonsense. This site is a step backward into the old
Of course, I could tell you what I really think, but I don't want to
be too abrasive. :-)
http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php