Sorry if anyone sees this twice. Reposting as my original reply has gone missing.
On 20 Jun, 01:56, cem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jun 19, 9:22 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > On 19 Jun, 18:11, Matthew Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > 2. There are some horrible network delays. I am working at home on a > > > > For example I just got a timeout. We can see it is going out on the > > > web forhttp://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/: > > > > .<br /> > > > <b>Warning</b>: SDO_DAS_XML::create(http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/) > > > [<a href='function.SDO-DAS-XML-create'>function.SDO-DAS-XML-create</ > > > a>]: failed to open stream: A connection attempt failed because the > > > connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or > > > established connection failed because connected host has failed to > > > respond. > > > in <b>C:\php\PEAR\SCA\Bindings\soap\ServiceDescriptionGenerator.php</ > > > b> on line <b>65</b><br /> > > > <br /> > > > <b>Warning</b>: SDO_DAS_XML::create() [<a href='function.SDO-DAS-XML- > > > create'>function.SDO-DAS-XML-create</a>]: I/O warning : failed to load > > > external entity "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"in <b>C: > > > \php\PEAR\SCA\Bindings\soap\ServiceDescriptionGenerator.php</b> on > > > line <b>65</b><br /> > > > So is this definitive proof that the fix in Tuscany is not preventing > > SDO from chasing URLs even when it has the types to hand? > > Simon, can you point us to details of the Tuscany change you refer > to? I was sure there was a JIRA about reducing the number of times C++ SDO goes out across the network but I can't find it now. I've raise a very specific one for the problem we are seeing http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1362 > > I think that a change that was made in > Buzzard:http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pecl/sdo/SDO_DAS_XML.cpp?r1=1.21.2.3.2...., > may be implicated here. You could experiment with turning off that > flag and see what happens. This change seems to be required for http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=9243 so I've left it in > > It could be seen as unfortunate that the soap schema imports the wsdl > schema but without a schemaLocation. I suppose it would be completely > out of order to fix that in our local copy? If so, then perhaps the > time has come for some hard-coded relationship? It's perfectly > legitimate to have built-in schema if we choose. I'm told it's a license thing. I.e that the WSDL schemas that we redistribute should look the same as the originals? Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
