Hi Kriangkrai,

>    (with-xml
>       (<tag1 (@ attr1 val1)
>          "text"
>          (<tag2 "text")
>          "text" ))

If you go this route, why not something like:

(with-xml
   (<tag1 @attr1 val1
      "text"
      (<tag2 "text")
      "text" ) )

Also, if you don't manage to hook your error handler to define the tag
functions "on-the-fly", you can always traverse the tree argument of
'with-xml' and replace (or define) the tag symbols with your generic
tag function and then eval the whole tree.

Cheers,

Tomas
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to