I thougt PicoLisp used its' own assembler?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:24:05AM +0200, Jon Kleiser wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to look at the old problem of building 64-bit PicoLisp on Mac OS > X. Assemblers are far from what I usually play with, but at least I'd like > to spend a few hours today on this problem. > >From what I've found on the net, I got the impression that the standard > (?) assembler on OSX is "nasm", and that the nasm versions found on Macs > are often quite old (just do "nasm -v", and you'll see). My idea then was > that it might help to install an up-to-date version. Then I wanted to > check which version I had on my Ubuntu, where I build 64-bit PicoLisp > without problem, but on my Ubuntu I found no "nasm"; here "as" (2.20.1) > seems to be the standard assembler. On Mac (OSX 10.6.7) even "as" is not > very new, I found 1.38. Maybe I should try to upgrade "as" instead of > "nasm" ... Any comments? > > /Jon > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe
