It was a discussion without the call for a vote. I am attaching the
email that was sent out back then.
From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
Santhosh, the version numbering was discussed on this list almost 2
weeks ago. Why didn't you participate then?
On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> a little bit more work.
> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> Pig Committers,
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> Please download, test, and try it out:
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.
--- Begin Message ---
Pig Developers and Committers,
Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
propose that it is time for the next release.
I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a major
rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable
--- End Message ---