I would like to understand what it will take to release 1.0.0 before I cast my vote.
Olga > -----Original Message----- > From: Nigel Daley [mailto:nda...@yahoo-inc.com] > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:30 PM > To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0) > > +1. > > On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > > > To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an > appropriate release > > number, I propose that we release the same code under the > name 0.2.0. > > > > Alan. > > > > On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote: > > > >> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable > but not quite > >> there. I would prefer 0.2.0 > >> > >> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will > >> require a little bit more work. > >> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt 3. > >> There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces > >> > >> Santhosh > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com] > >> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM > >> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org > >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0) > >> > >> Pig Committers, > >> > >> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0. > >> > >> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the > parser down. > >> It also introduced type system into Pig and greatly > improved system > >> performance. > >> > >> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files > >> listed as being without a license header. All these files are > >> generated by javacc. > >> > >> Keys used to sign the release are available at > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/pig/trunk/KEYS?view=markup. > >> > >> Please download, test, and try it out: > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0 > >> <http://people.apache.org/~olga/pig-1.0.0-candidate-0> > >> > >> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th. > >> > >> Olga > > > >
