On 2015-12-04 16:05:27 [+0100], Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > >> (Though it would be great if clamav wouldn't need this libclamunrar hack, > >> and instead could use e.g. libarchive for rar support.) > > > > My memory was that libarchive did not support v3 but according to > > https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/issues/151#issuecomment-91876723 > > the libarchive implementation support lzss which should be v3. So this > > looks like it is as good as the non-free code we have here. > > It seems to work with the clamav test file (bsdcpio uses libarchive): > $ bsdcpio -i < /usr/share/clamav-testfiles/clam-v3.rar ; echo $? > 1 block > 0
Okay. I put this somehwere on my list. I try to push the fts patch into clamav upstream as well so this will end up with a really low prio. I was going through the issues on libarchive and they had a few of "invalid archive, libarchive goes boom". So I think step one would be to get rid of those / report them. > > I imported the 0.99 which almost identical to 0.99-rc2. Since you did > > all the heavy lifting it easy doing :) I merged unstable into experimetal > > with "git merge -s ours unstable" so once we do the upload we can simply > > merge the experimental branch into unstable without any conflicts. > > It seems you forgot to push the upstream-experimental branch. I managed to merge experimental into upstream-experimental and make a mess. Lucky this did not leak into the release in any kind. git-dpm complained about beeing not able to tag. So I rolled back upstream-experimental + upstream-unstable to something sane and pushed this out. Note that depending on when you pulled you may have pulled that non-sense. upstream-unstable should point to the tag upstream-0.99+dfsg. Sorry for that. > Best regards, > Andreas Sebastian _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
