On 06.12.2015 22:09, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2015-12-06 19:10:51 [+0100], Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >>> Okay. I put this somehwere on my list. I try to push the fts patch into >>> clamav upstream as well so this will end up with a really low prio. >> >> I don't think the fts patch is terribly useful for upstream, but maybe >> that's just me. > > We have that "use libmspack" patch. The prerequisit for it is a patch "use > proper > %ld, %lz and so on" patch. A few months ago upstream complained that with the > latter patch they get a segfault in their testsuite. I told them that it works > fine over here and didn't hear anything since but it looks like they are > trying. So if they enable LFS they would this fts() thingy as well. That is > why I assume they would need it, too.
I see. >>> I was going through the issues on libarchive and they had a few of >>> "invalid archive, libarchive goes boom". So I think step one would be to >>> get rid of those / report them. >> >> I'll fuzz-test libarchive a bit... > Cool. Haven't found anything, so far. Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
