On 06.12.2015 14:29, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2015-12-04 16:05:27 [+0100], Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >>>> (Though it would be great if clamav wouldn't need this libclamunrar hack, >>>> and instead could use e.g. libarchive for rar support.) >>> >>> My memory was that libarchive did not support v3 but according to >>> https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/issues/151#issuecomment-91876723 >>> the libarchive implementation support lzss which should be v3. So this >>> looks like it is as good as the non-free code we have here. >> >> It seems to work with the clamav test file (bsdcpio uses libarchive): >> $ bsdcpio -i < /usr/share/clamav-testfiles/clam-v3.rar ; echo $? >> 1 block >> 0 > > Okay. I put this somehwere on my list. I try to push the fts patch into > clamav upstream as well so this will end up with a really low prio.
I don't think the fts patch is terribly useful for upstream, but maybe that's just me. > I was going through the issues on libarchive and they had a few of > "invalid archive, libarchive goes boom". So I think step one would be to > get rid of those / report them. I'll fuzz-test libarchive a bit... > I managed to merge experimental into upstream-experimental and make a mess. > Lucky this did not leak into the release in any kind. git-dpm complained > about beeing not able to tag. > So I rolled back upstream-experimental + upstream-unstable to something > sane and pushed this out. Note that depending on when you pulled you may > have pulled that non-sense. upstream-unstable should point to the tag > upstream-0.99+dfsg. > Sorry for that. Thanks for fixing, and don't worry: errare humanum est. Best regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clamav-devel
