Brock Pytlik wrote:
I don't really think the --be-name is the appropriate place to explain what a BE is, how they work, or when they're created, etc. I'm fine with documenting that the command will fail if a be-name is given but none is to be created, but beyond that, I think that's out of scope. If a user chooses to use this feature, then most likely they're either just image-updating their main installed image naively, in which case this should work, or they're working on a user or alternative image, which means they're most likely already sufficiently sophisticated to know what a BE is.
As an alternative to defining what a boot environment is here, we could just add "see also beadm(1m)" to the bottom.
-- Shawn Walker _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
