Bart Smaalders wrote: > On 01/22/10 09:59, Shawn Walker wrote: > > >line 860: so this else case handles both 'optional' and exclude deps? > >I'm probably missing something here. > > optional and exclude dependencies are just mirror images of each other: > > optional @2.0 means that if present, fmri version must be at 2.0 or > greater. > > exclude @2.0 means that if present, fmri version must be less than 2.0
It would probably be useful to have a comment in that else clause, then, noting that optional dependencies are handled by this case, too, as well as what in the code causes it -- I presume that match/unmatch are transposed between the two cases? Danek _______________________________________________ pkg-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
