On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 20:18:45 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi, > > Does gdal need an explicit Build-Depends: ruby1.8 instead of ruby; > would that cause the buildscripts to pick the right include paths?
I'd rather suggest removing gdal's ruby packages. They have no reverse deps in the archive anyway. Cheers, Julien
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkgemail@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel