Alle lunedì 21 luglio 2008, Pierre Habouzit ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 07:21:12PM +0000, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:03:42PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 05:44:23PM +0000, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > > > On 2008-07-19, Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > -okular, the new KDE 4 document viewer. (source split from KDE 4's
> > > > > kdegraphics)
> > > >
> > > > Is it indended to replace or accompany kpdf for Lenny?
> > >
> > >   I hope not, okular isn't a decent replacement for kpdf for me yet.
> >
> > seriuosly? first time I have read somebody prefer kpdf over okular.
> Seriously:
>   + navigation of hyperlinks is badly broken (doesn't jump in the proper
>     places e.g.);

Bug reported but never been able to reproduce myself.

>   + I *hate* the left widget with silly icons that eat horizontal space
>     for no good reason, and miss the previous "sliding" widget that
>     implemented the very same in kpdf, and it's a big no-go for me, I've
>     a small screen on my laptop ;

The "silly" icons have a reason for being there, but given what you said, 
telling the reason is pointless. Anyway, 22px is a so huge problem?

>   + there are quite a few annoying glitches with the thumbnail
>     navigation too, I don't recall which though.


>   And there are quite a few quirks that are irritating beyond words,
> when you work with huge PDFs files (lots of norms, POSIX documentation,
> and whatnot) on a hourly basis.

And do you hope that the "few quirks that are irritating" will automagically 
solve themselves during the night?
I'll tell you what's "irritating": users that don't speak even if forced, but 
they do really complain (even a lot) about the state of things. This will NOT 
help us (and you probably know that).

>   Kpdf may lack a few fancy thingies, but the UI is overall more
> polished.

Huge POV; many other users actually think the opposite.

> Like we say in france, the devil is in the details. okular is 
> gross compared to what kpdf does for now.

Cool with words, eh. It's not like we tried to improve it, to get "gross" 

Pino Toscano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply via email to