¡Hola Maximiliano!

On Fri 2016-10-07 09:45:25 -0400, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> Yes, sorry for not replying sooner. We are not planning to upload a new 
> version of gpgmepp (we are currently skipping 16.08 and upstream is 
> apparently 
> dropping gpgmepp for 16.12).

ok, cool.  so then taking it over with the gpgme1.0 source package
should be OK.

I'm not entirely sure what to do about the name of the library during
this handoff -- it might drop the "kf5" prefix.  If we don't drop the
"kf5" prefix, i suppose we'll need an epoch number in the package
version to make sure that upgrades happen.  It's also possible that
we'll need to do a similar thing with qgpgme, i guess.

thanks for the reply,


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply via email to