Well it just proves to show how different our experiences are with hard
drives. I've had horror stories with Seagate IDEs [esp. medalist] so
often that i shun the thought of even considering it for server use...
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, fooler wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ian C. Sison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 1:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup?
>
> > In my experience IDE drives also fail much earlier than SCSIs. I've seen
> > SCSIs running 24x7 for more than 4 years, while IDEs basically croak on me
> > at 2 years.
>
> oic but beware of imitated and poor brand of ide which give you a shorter
> life expectancy. my favorite ide drive is seagate and for five years now, it
> is still up and running without a bad blocks. :->
>
> fooler.
>
> _
> Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
> To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
