Quoting Jared Odulio ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > My "sleek performance" standard depends on a case-to-case basis and is > context-sensitive. Eclipse is an IDE, StarOffice is not.
Aw, c'mon, Jared. Don't be so obtuse. _Obviously_, the implied comparison was not Star Office to any IDE, but rather Star Office to other office suites / word processors. The most horrendous metric for Star Office resource consumption is of course disk space, but let's look for a moment at RAM consumption at load time (since I have figures handy): Star Office 6.0: 73 MB OpenOffice.org 1.0.2: 73 MB KWord 1.1.1: 17 MB Corel WordPerfect 8.0/8.1: 6 MB AbiWord 1.02: 6 MB Thus my point. > If you will compare Eclipse versus NetBeans that's pretty related.... So, you're saying one Java tool isn't too ghastly compared to a -=second Java tool=-? <chuckle> I see. Well, that clarifies your standards. -- Cheers, "Don't use Outlook. Outlook is really just a security Rick Moen hole with a small e-mail client attached to it." [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Brian Trosko in r.a.sf.w.r-j -- Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Official Website: http://plug.linux.org.ph Searchable Archives: http://marc.free.net.ph . To leave, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/plug . Are you a Linux newbie? To join the newbie list, go to http://lists.q-linux.com/mailman/listinfo/ph-linux-newbie
