On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Jason Jones<[email protected]> wrote: > Given this info, please understand that this might be a bit too personal for > me to detach myself and consider this from an objective point of view
Given that, I'm surprised you managed to remain as civil as you did. > This whole conversation has been highly offensive I must have a different idea of "offensive" than other people, because I get that a lot. > >From the inside information I have, let it be known that there was nothing > negligent, NOTHING NEGLIGENT about what the aunt did. It was a complete > accident by definition of the word. Are you willing to share what you know? It seems like that might be a better option than just handing out insults and then saying "trust me" afterward. Also, have you considered that (as you stated above) the issue is too personal for people close to it to think about objectively, and therefore the things they've been telling people haven't been 100% true? I'm not accusing people of lying, but when someone is struck by a tragedy, they're not always thinking (or remembering) clearly. > I hope you are completely and totally alone in your thinking this had > anything to do with negligence. Please think twice before letting such raw > topics be talked about so flippantly in the future. Kind of doubt it. Anyone who doesn't know the same inside information you do has probably had it at least cross their mind. -Dan /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
