On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Matthew Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've never had a good experience with recruiters.
Ouch. Ouch. I can't tell exactly, but I think I may be in the minority here when I state that I think you should let the poor recruiters join the list if they want and let them sink or swim. I say, if they can handle the content of the list, and the inherent potential of scathing flames when they violate the community's rules, then let them in. By gosh sakes, they might actually LEARN something about Linux if we're not careful. While I see all your reasoning for a separate list--in fact if the recruiters will do nothing but "post jobs", yeah--push that somewhere else. I just hope you don't kick all the recruiters out of this list, as I know one in-particular who rather enjoys trying to keep up with Nick Leippe's calculations on folder depth vs files/folder (my head exploded) and has literally laughed out loud reading the banter on the proper ediquette for staring a flame war, the personal jabs and jeers between colleagues, and the value of red shirts to any organization. ...Just make sure the PURE plug list stays perfectly on-topic all the time and make sure all that off-topic job crap gets shelled off in its own recycle bin somewhere. #imjustsayin Robert Merrill "Vaguely awesome quote from Matrix/Firefly/Battlestar Gallactica/Glee Goes Here" MD5 Hash of this message goes here Public Key of my encrypted Md5 hash of this message goes here < Sarcastic Grin /> *ducks* /* PLUG: http://plug.org, #utah on irc.freenode.net Unsubscribe: http://plug.org/mailman/options/plug Don't fear the penguin. */
