Hi Tom, 

 

I’m the RSO at MPI Research in Mattawan, MI.  I have a broad scope NRC license 
(Part 30 materials license) which covers all of our radioactive material uses 
(since MI is not an agreement state) and state registration for our various 
X-ray machines.  We follow Part 20 requirements for work with radioactive 
materials and MI Part 5 for radiation producing machines.  Since I have quite a 
bit of fluoroscope dose to contend with, I’m functionally locked in to 
quarterly monitoring.  I can’t neatly separate the doses on an individual 
basis.  But since power plants generally have no significant dose associated 
with X-ray machines, you can rely on your Part 50 license and use Part 20.

 

Dick Granberg

[email protected]

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Thomas M Lashley
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 1:33 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Powernet: State Radiation Rules vs. six-month dosimetry monitoring 
periods.

 

Fermi 2 and other NRC Licensed facilities are moving towards six-month 
dosimetry monitoring periods.  When I  stated that to an inspector from  The 
State of Michigan he said that  would be a noncompliance issue.  He said  
Michigan Rules state that monitoring periods must not be greater then 
quarterly.  Has anyone else run into this problem?

 

 

Thomas M. Lashley, RSO
Principal Radiological Engineer 
DTE Energy, Fermi 2 
734-586-1697 

 

 

Reply via email to