On 13/10/03 9:39 pm simon buckley wrote: > Thirded. > I've often thought the same with regard to web discussion. > So much of what we do is now intended for the web. Indeed > Putting our pictures on the web is only another version of showing > our work as prints.
Dear Ed and list, I too would have thought this TOTALLY appropriate to this list and DIGITAL IMAGING. Digital imaging is always for a purpose and for many of us, that will include images for web promotion, either for ourselves or for clients. This IS professional photography. I am building (having built) a data-base driven site and I am desperate to know why certain web applications can't see or use key-words loaded in PhotoShop. EXIF info is still there, as well as file info, but not keywords. My questions and others before me are asking about photographs, NOT web 'design' per se. I would agree that "do buttons look better than tick boxes" is not appropriate but keywords, file info, and file preparation is surely ESSENTIAL to all of us? With respect, Glyn -- Glyn Davies Photography Northern Committee of AOP www.glyndavies.com Tel: 01248 715511 =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
