I think the logic goes something like this (for want of a better word - I'll
just say "burglar") :-

Burglar NOT there = no one gets hurt!

Burglar has gun, owner doesn't  = Burglar shouldn't be there to begin with,
owner at disadvantage.

Burglar doesn't have gun, owner does = Burglar still shouldn't be there,
advantage to owner.

Burglar has gun, owner does = Burglar still shouldn't be there!, and fair
game to both of them.

<g>

Robbo.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dominic Burford
Sent: 22 June 2006 07:50
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] Once again a gun saves a life

Huh!!  It saves one life, by claiming aother like in the process.

If neither one had been armed with guns, both would have survived.  I
don't see your point.

Regards

Dominic Burford BSc Hons MBCS CITP
Third Party Developer Program Senior Software Engineer 

* Tel: +44 (0) 1536 495074
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

"I conclude that there are two ways of constructing a software design:
One way is to make it so simple there are obviously no deficiencies, and
the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
deficiencies." -- Tony Hoare, Turing Award Lecture 1980


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 21 June 2006 18:57
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: [OT] Once again a gun saves a life

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3989147.html

**** New Lower Prices *****
Horse Racing Photos at http://michaelmadigan.exposuremanager.com/


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to