Ken,
What tweaks do you use?

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Dibble
Sent: 30 January 2014 15:19
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Multi-user DBF files on Samba share.


>I think there are a few people out there doing this.
>
>Any recommended settings, known problems or minimum versions of Samba 
>to use?

I've been doing this for 7-8 years without any problems at all. Currently using 
version 3.x on CentOS.

Users on workstation connect to the share via mapped drives. The directory 
structure has an outer folder that contains all the dbf and related files, and 
two folders: /backup and /semaphore. Any user with a domain login can 
read/write to the outer folder but cannot create/delete files there. The inner 
folders allow full permissions to any domain user so the software can 
create/read/delete files in those folders. This way I don't have to explicitly 
grant access to specific users, and disgruntled employees can't wipe out the 
data.

This also works fine for people running my software remotely via a Windows RDP 
server--no loss of speed whatsoever except for printing.

When I first started I used to set oplocks off on the SAMBA server, because 
lots of people said I should do that. But when I went to a new machine/SAMBA 
version I didn't bother with that, and I haven't had any problems as a result. 
Also, at least in version 3, I don't run into the problem with Windows 7 mapped 
drives being disconnected due to inactivity that people using that OS to 
connect to Windows servers have reported.

(We also use SAMBA to emulate a Win-NT domain. It's not as full-featured as 
actual Windows NT was, but it does everything I need it to do, and Win 7/Server 
2008 and Win 8/Server 2012 boxes just require a couple of registry tweaks to 
enable them to join the domain.)

I love SAMBA!

Ken Dibble
www.stic-cil.org 


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to