On Nov 29, 2007 10:42 AM, Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Im still not sure of your point. It seems to me you are saying use dotnet
> because VFP is old hat.
> VFP could easy be made to keep up with the new technology. It is after all
> just another programming job. If a leech could do the same as xrays it
> could
> compete, it cant but VFP could compete with dotnet.
> thats my point. the fact that it wont is a bit sad and more the point of
> looking elsewhere. I may have to if I cant get VFP to run a web service
> right.
> Allen
>

I can crank out a WS in no time at all for consumption to a select set or
unlimited access.  Now with WCF you can get a lot more security on both
sides of the connection.

I can consume a WS in no time in an app.  Web or Win.  I can use that for my
data layer as a whole or just for smaller needs of some crud operations or
validations.

Granted you can do that with a great many languages out there.  C comes to
mind as well as java and python.

The only thing that you have to do is break the mold of always starting your
computer and then opening up VFP.  You have to choose another tool to spend
time at learning how to use.  Put in 30 min in the morning and 30 min at
lunch.  If you can squeeze in a last bit at the end of the day even better.
In a few short weeks you will have done the hello world as well as the
simple little list box type of thing.  It just takes time.


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to