On Dec 27, 2007 9:41 AM, Mike Wohlrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>the more Windows has progressed, the more Norton has become a resource > hog. > > Pat, According to your statement there, it would be M$ fault for why > norton > is slow. Like i said earlier, i have a typical system running amd athlon > 2gz > and 2 gb ram and it works perfectly fine with no performance issues that i > can see or notice. > > Norton does have a removal tool out to completely remove norton if the > uninstaller fails to work. maybe some of you should relook at norton again > after you have stopped using their products years ago. a lot can change in > a > company and their product in a few years.
I hate the fact that Dell ships Norton out with their base products. Or at least that was on my son's replacement laptop. He could not remove it and had to reformat the disk and do a fresh OS install. His school demands the use of McAfee for access to their internet. Norton is just a RPITA and not worth my time to deal with. It acts like a 500# gorilla when I want a chimp to find the virus attempting to enter my machine. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
