Paul, > How about calling it "yelp"? http://yelp.com
Looks like it either succumbed to feature creep or wasn't trying to nail the (simple and singular) concept in the first place. It also seems limited in scope*, and the name conjures a vision of a cry - versus evoking a neutral feeling of results that can positive or negative. * no problem with local screens, but to reach critical mass (as, say, eBay did), it would have to be broader in scope (and singular in purpose) Bill Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
