Bill Arnold wrote: > Paul, > >> How about calling it "yelp"? > > http://yelp.com > > > Looks like it either succumbed to feature creep or wasn't trying to nail > the (simple and singular) concept in the first place. It also seems > limited in scope*, and the name conjures a vision of a cry - versus > evoking a neutral feeling of results that can positive or negative.
Here's one that's VERY limited in scope. :) http://www.rottenneighbor.com/ Whil _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
