Maybe it is a personal vendetta, but so what?  Would
you like your enemy to be republishing your work
"illegally".  Illegally is in quotes because I have no
idea whether it is or not.

What if you found one of your customers reselling your
software?



--- MB Software Solutions General Account
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ed Leafe wrote:
> >     This whole thing smells of personal vendetta. I
> wonder what the  
> > potential for income would be for computer
> articles that are a decade- 
> > plus old; my guess would be zero. I think that
> I'll steer clear of  
> > this whole train wreck.
> >   
> 
> Absolutely...I would concur on all your
> points...sounds like personal 
> vendetta and the value of those articles is probably
> nil....nothing that 
> couldn't be gotten from other online resources
> currently existing I'd bet.
> 
> Enough of this stupid thread already....SHEEP!
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: [email protected]
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
> 



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to