On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2008, at 12:29 PM, David Crooks wrote: > > > It seems this group leans more to anti-MSFT (maybe because > > they speak up more?), > > Or maybe because they've been burned more? > > > but the new technologies from MSFT are pretty cool. > > Granted. The question is whether they are cooler than the new > stuff > outside of Microsoft. > > It seems that for many, especially those who claim an > anti-Microsoft > bias in others, the Microsoft solution is the default, and as long as > that's good enough, that's what they choose. Their knowledge of the > breadth of choices outside of .net is generally pretty weak. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I agree Ed I'm sure that your as deep in your understanding of the direction in architecture for .net at the same time? We all know that there is a limit in the # of hours in the day and what we can accomplish. As the breath of this tool set grows I don't see how you could be competent in other disciplines outside of it and still be good in .NET. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
