On Apr 11, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> Why do you constantly define the COMPANY as the most important
> aspect of the
> software or tool?
I said the exact opposite, and it's disingenuous to suggest
otherwise. The licensing *is* critical, and Microsoft isn't the only
company that comes up short in this regard. I use both MySQL and
PostgreSQL, but the licensing issues have made me switch to Postgres
as my default database server.
> I want the TOOL that does the job the best or one that
> gives me a completive advantage over my other competitors. .NET
> gives me
> both of those and that opens a lot of doors here in my community.
> If that
> weren't so I'd have found some other tool set.
Nobody has said otherwise. My only comment was the implication by you
that this is somehow exclusive to the Microsoft world.
> Seems that your only impressed by the components around a person and
> fail to
> see the human Ed. It sounds as juvenile as evaluating a person by the
> vehicle they drive or the shoes a woman is wearing.
???
Who's judging the person based on their tools? I only responded to
David Crooks comment that those who do not go the .net route are a
priori anti-Microsoft.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
