On Apr 11, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> I agree Ed I'm sure that your as deep in your understanding of the
> direction
> in architecture for .net at the same time?
Depth is necessary only to the level to which it needs to be used. I
actually like a lot of the .net architecture, as it *finally* shows
that they have been learning good design practices that have been
common in other systems. I like C# to the same degree that I like Java.
This is what I mean by SET DEFAULT TO MICROSOFT in the minds of many.
While the .net framework is a good one, it is hardly compellingly
better than others to justify the costs and lock-in that would be
required to select that as a solution.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
