Bob Calco wrote: >> So let's for a minute suppose you are right, then Obama is really >> spending 0.7 Trillion and the other 0.7 are on Georgie's. So you've got >> to pay first 2 Trillion of Georgie's debt before you start paying for >> 0.7 Obama's. And what's more, you already know the outcome of Georgie's >> spending, whereas you still have to see what happens with Obama. You >> have to give him 4 years, don't you? >> So now that I've proved my point (even accepting your premises!) let's >> leave it at that, and go to sleep old man. >> > > You've not proved anything you old dolt. > Your math skills are gone you old fart. > Bush's $800 billion (liberating 50 million people, and all he got was a shoe > thrown at him) + $400 billion (give the old farts their drugs, and watch > them vote Democrat anyway), and other enormous increases in entitlement > spending on education, etc., over eight years is bad, I agree, and yes we > have to pay that off, somehow. I'm accepting your premise now. > Nananah! You yourself said bush spent 1.3trillion in firecrackers, and that Obama was spending 1.4trillion in the rescue. Then you accept the rescue's fault is both's responsibility. I accept (for the sake of going on with life) your argument and add things up, that gives me Georgie = 1.3+0.7 = 2 trillion while Obama = 1.4/2 = 0.7 trillion So stop trying to sell snake oil and go out and get a job old man.
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
