Bob Calco wrote: > The assumption that these executives were to blame for the failure are > belied by the fact that the Banking Committee doesn't even know who they > are---how now can you blame them whom you do not know? > > I'd rather like to see your defense of the Stalinist moves to breach private > contracts ex post facto---that's to me the real purpose of this manufactured > controversy, to establish that the government can willy-nilly and > retroactively change private contracts, and confiscate 100% of receipts > under private contracts. > > The radical nature of this may not be evident now, but when we're reduced to > a third world hell hole in a few years and people are scratching their heads > wondering, "What happened to hope and change?" they'll have nothing but > their own intellectual laziness to blame.
Hi Bob! Yes, the Ds are ignorant to want to do what they want to do. But 1) it won't get through the Senate and 2) if it does the SCOTUS will stop it. The sky isn't falling. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
