Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > Michael Oke, II wrote: >>> Or the legal right of Coca Cola company to make business abroad? What >>> did you use to call it? Free trade, was it? >>> Why does Ford, GM, Coca Cola, MicroShit, etc have the right to work and >>> offer their products abroad (and take earnings back to US share holders) >>> while Mexican people can not work inside USA (and send money to their >>> families)? >>> >> Because they are legally admitted to these countries to conduct business >> and they comply with all applicable laws to do just that. Hardly >> comparable to illegals working within the borders of America. >> > They are not illegals till they are caught. As your companies comply > with all applicable laws till they are found bribing officials for said > compliance. And then a scape goat gets blamed and transferred to some > other part of the company, then everything keeps working in the same > "legal" way. > Oh, except when laws are passed against the commercial interests of US > companies in which case a convenient coup is backed by the CIA or some > officials die in a tragic accident, or the US army is called under some > other pretense. Yeah, we all know how you do "legal" business. Caught or not, it is still illegal. Talk about a conspiracy theorist.
> >>>> As for getting a hold of these resources, in most cases they merely >>>> apply and are given. Is that hard to understand? If you want to know >>>> why, I recommend that you contact the legislature of California and ask >>>> them. >>>> >>>> >>> So you mean to tell me that those naughty foreigners have only to apply >>> for a work permit and it is given? So why don't they? >>> >> You would have to ask the foreigners as to why the find it necessary to >> break the law. > We tried to ask IBM and Skanska why did they find it necessary to break > the law and pay huge bribes. We were never given a satisfying answer. Not being part of either of those companies, I would be unable to provide you any substantive answer nor do I find it relevant to this conversation. > >> Perhaps the wonderful countries in which they originate >> do not permit them to earn a sufficient amount of money to afford the >> legal method. >> > Yup! Same thing happens to Pete and Virgil in the wonderful country in > which they have originated. > But they choose to whine and moan instead of doing the manly thing and > get busy anywhere anyhow. Seems you Yanks get to moan every time you are > on the wrong side of the knife. The moaning about this seems to be emanating from south of the border. Why do you suppose that is? As for Pete and Virgil, their choice to whine is just that, their choice. I can't do anything about it but nor do I have to join with them. > >>>>>> And we don't have social medicine? How untrue. You would >>>>>> merely have to spend an evening in the emergency room of almost any >>>>>> hospital in southern California to know that. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> So Virgil, and Pete, and ......whoever. Are just whiners. They are >>>>> really against the system, they are communists in disguise. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Pretty sure that they aren't altho Pete seems to straying into a >>>> different area of late. >>>> > You mean they are no commies? Then you think they are just plain whining > sissies? I have no idea if they are commies or whining sissies, nor do I care. > >> Illegals can and do receive free treatment and they are NOT deported >> following said treatment. > LOL Care to dispute the statement? I thought not. > >> There is no assessment of a person's legal >> right to be in the country in an emergency room. As far as taxes, the >> contributions to the tax base by illegals is a petance in comparison to >> the services that they consume. > And you state that based on........ My discussions with officials and doctors that work at these hospitals. It's not a difficult assessment to make. Or just look at some of the local laws enacted by cities in California where they have declared themselves "sanctuary cities". I apologize for the misspelling of the word pittance as well, not sure what I was thinking there. > >> It would be impossible for them to >> avoid paying sales tax as they do have to purchase their food and the >> petrol that they put into their often unlicensed and uninsured >> automobiles from local establishments. >> > Really? I thought they just robbed their food and gas. > So they pay for it. So all you are complaining about is that they work > harder than you and for less money? > Grow up! Be a man! Oh I'm sure that there are those that rob for both food and gas but there are plenty of citizens and residents that do that as well. I'm not making any statement about how hard they work, many are very good workers, that doesn't change that fact that they are not legally here. I'll thank you to worry about yourself and not spend time telling me to grow up. Neither that nor my manhood are germane to this discussion nor do I have any question about either. ::michael _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
