The problem is that there might be many names, only some of which you
want detail on. I guess I need to handle f. anyway, and I could expand
a tacit name if the object of f. .
There is surely SOME difference between explicits and tacits. For
example, I couldn't have written ds as an explicit verb, since it needs
access to local names.
Henry Rich
On 6/3/2013 1:48 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
I think explicit verbs are just like any other verbs, just bigger.
As for expansion of names, I'd be tempted to have that be another
entry point (dsn?) or perhaps a left argument for ds. I would be
uncomfortable with explaining to someone "this code does not actually
work and it represents this other code".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
