I have fixed the display error and now the testcase fails the way it
ought to, with unexpected results from the verb. A fix for that will
have to await support of $: .
Henry Rich
On 6/3/2013 12:59 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
My thoughts on this include:
All verbs are tacit verbs, even explicit verbs in a sort of empty
sense. And, 5!:5 <'name' could be a good thing to run ds on.
I think ds has a problem with $: and this is related to some issues
that might come up when dealing with named code (or at least, when
thinking about code naming issues it occurred to me that I should test
how ds deals with $:):
(0 >. ]`($:@<:)@.*) 3
0
ds '(0 >. ]`($:@<:)@.*) 3'
|assertion failure: sizesentence
ds would be a good companion to a ui for trace. Where trace shows you
the parsing of a sentence, ds will show you the data flow which occurs
afterwards. But there are clear limitations on this approach, for
example if the sentence uses ? ds should show different data each time
it's used.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
