ds 'hist 6' only shows the starting and ending values, not the
intermediate values.

This is more interesting,  from my point of view:

   hist f.
' O' {~ (] !~ [: i. >:) >/ [: i. [: >./ ] !~ [: i. >:
   ds '('' O'' {~ (] !~ [: i. >:) >/ [: i. [: >./ ] !~ [: i. >:) 6'

Also interesting comparing:

   ds '('' O'' {~ (] !~ i.@>:) >/ [: i. ] >./@:!~ i.@>:) 6'

   ds '('' O'' {~ (!~ i.@>:) >/ i.@(>./@:!~ i.@>:)) 6'

   ds '('' O'' {~ (i.@>: ! ]) >/ i.@(i.@>: >./@:! ])) 6'

and contrasting:

   ds '('' O'' {~ (] >/ i.@(>./))@(i.@>: ! ])) 6'


--
Raul

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linda Alvord <[email protected]> wrote:
> You'll want this too.
>
>    pas=: 13 :'(i.>:y)!y'
>    pas
> ] !~ [: i. >:
>
>    pas 6
> 1 6 15 20 15 6 1
>
> Linda
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Linda Alvord
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 3:49 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] z458095869_dissectnopath_
>
> Henry,  ds is fun!
>
>    hist=: 13 :'((pas y)>/i.>./pas y){'' O'''
>    histi
> ' O' {~ pas >/ [: i. [: >./ pas
>   hist 6
> O
> OOOOOO
> OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
> OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
> OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
> OOOOOO
> O
>   ds 'hist 6'
>   ds 'hist 8'
>
> It could get even bigger!
>
> Linda
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henry Rich
> Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 9:21 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] z458095869_dissectnopath_
>
> Yes, and Ye Dic spells it out:
>
> m"(-r) y is equivalent to m"(0>.(#$y)-r)"_
>
> Note the final "_
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On 6/2/2013 8:55 PM, Roger Hui wrote:
>> v b. 0 reports the on what the system thinks are the monadic, left,
>> and right ranks, and those ranks are always positive.  The following
>> phrase shows another way that 0"_1 has infinite rank.
>>
>>
>>     <@(0"_1) i.2 3
>> ┌───┐
>> │0 0│
>> └───┘
>>
>> When the "combining ranks" of a verb are negative, the interpretation
>> is nasty and counterintuitive.  Some of the nastiness were discussed
>> in APL papers from the late 1980s.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I think
>>>
>>>     0"_1 b. 0
>>> _
>>>
>>> I think that result should be _1 _1 _1
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to