The left argument could be a list of names. And, I should have said "I think explicit verbs are just like primitive verbs, just bigger, when the context is tacit verbs."
Thanks, -- Raul On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote: > The problem is that there might be many names, only some of which you want > detail on. I guess I need to handle f. anyway, and I could expand a tacit > name if the object of f. . > > > There is surely SOME difference between explicits and tacits. For example, > I couldn't have written ds as an explicit verb, since it needs access to > local names. > > Henry Rich > > > On 6/3/2013 1:48 PM, Raul Miller wrote: >> >> I think explicit verbs are just like any other verbs, just bigger. >> >> As for expansion of names, I'd be tempted to have that be another >> entry point (dsn?) or perhaps a left argument for ds. I would be >> uncomfortable with explaining to someone "this code does not actually >> work and it represents this other code". >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
