ds doesn't look inside verbs. Maybe there should be an option to
replace tacit verbs with their definitions, or to execute f. in the
parser to expand a tacit definition. I'll have to think about that.
Henry Rich
On 6/3/2013 9:27 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
ds 'hist 6' only shows the starting and ending values, not the
intermediate values.
This is more interesting, from my point of view:
hist f.
' O' {~ (] !~ [: i. >:) >/ [: i. [: >./ ] !~ [: i. >:
ds '('' O'' {~ (] !~ [: i. >:) >/ [: i. [: >./ ] !~ [: i. >:) 6'
Also interesting comparing:
ds '('' O'' {~ (] !~ i.@>:) >/ [: i. ] >./@:!~ i.@>:) 6'
ds '('' O'' {~ (!~ i.@>:) >/ i.@(>./@:!~ i.@>:)) 6'
ds '('' O'' {~ (i.@>: ! ]) >/ i.@(i.@>: >./@:! ])) 6'
and contrasting:
ds '('' O'' {~ (] >/ i.@(>./))@(i.@>: ! ])) 6'
--
Raul
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linda Alvord <[email protected]> wrote:
You'll want this too.
pas=: 13 :'(i.>:y)!y'
pas
] !~ [: i. >:
pas 6
1 6 15 20 15 6 1
Linda
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Linda Alvord
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 3:49 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] z458095869_dissectnopath_
Henry, ds is fun!
hist=: 13 :'((pas y)>/i.>./pas y){'' O'''
histi
' O' {~ pas >/ [: i. [: >./ pas
hist 6
O
OOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOO
O
ds 'hist 6'
ds 'hist 8'
It could get even bigger!
Linda
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henry Rich
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 9:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] z458095869_dissectnopath_
Yes, and Ye Dic spells it out:
m"(-r) y is equivalent to m"(0>.(#$y)-r)"_
Note the final "_
Henry Rich
On 6/2/2013 8:55 PM, Roger Hui wrote:
v b. 0 reports the on what the system thinks are the monadic, left,
and right ranks, and those ranks are always positive. The following
phrase shows another way that 0"_1 has infinite rank.
<@(0"_1) i.2 3
┌───┐
│0 0│
└───┘
When the "combining ranks" of a verb are negative, the interpretation
is nasty and counterintuitive. Some of the nastiness were discussed
in APL papers from the late 1980s.
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
I think
0"_1 b. 0
_
I think that result should be _1 _1 _1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
