Try load the specific script inside the specific misc folder require '~addons/.../misc/....ijs'
On 19 Sep, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > Further to this, I've uploaded a new addon: 'debug/tte' > > used like this: > require 'debug/tte' > mytacitverb tte > > Studio > Labs --shows a new lab under Category: Debug: > Explicate (convert to explicit) a given tacit verb > > Or you can get some rough'n'ready documentation with: > ABOUT_tte_ > > At present it only works under j602. When I try it under j64-801 it fails > because: > require 'misc' > is no longer supported, giving the error: not found: > /Applications/j64-801/bin/misc > > > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Joe Bogner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Ian. trace looks helpful too. I hadn't stumbled upon that yet. >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Joe Bogner asks: >>> " Is there a utility to generate an explicit definition from a tacit >>> definition?" >>> >>> There've certainly been attempts at one. There hasn't been any published >>> improvement on this one by Zsban Ambrus: >>> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Scripts/TacitToExplicit >>> ...though I've had an add-on on the stocks, waiting to get properly >> tested >>> for almost a year now. (Sorry... it was low priority.) >>> >>> I also wrote a "roadmap" a year ago to pull together all the relevant >> stuff >>> on jwiki... >>> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Guides/Tacit_to_explicit_roadmap >>> ...but I notice I didn't finish it (it needs to mention Ambrus's "tte", >> and >>> it's incomplete in "Approach #2"). >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Joe Bogner <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm learning the evaluation rules for tacit expressions, since that is >>>> what's commonly posted as solutions. Is there a utility to generate an >>>> explicit definition from a tacit definition? >>>> >>>> For example, to generate a tacit expression from explicit >>>> >>>> 13 : '(+/ y) % # y' >>>> >>>> +/ % # >>>> >>>> Is there some routine to expand that out? (I've now learned that its a >>>> fork). It seems possible that it could expand out to multiple possible >>>> variants -- since as I understand, it's a reduced form. I've looked at >>>> fndisplay but didn't put too much time into it yet since I wasn't sure >>> that >>>> it's what I was looking for. >>>> >>>> >>>> Along those same lines, j6 shows a representation of an expression in >>> boxes >>>> which I've found to be helpful to understand how an expression is >>> grouped. >>>> I haven't seen that same functionality in j7 or j8. Does it exist? >>>> >>>> I find myself spending a fair amount of time taking an expression and >>> then >>>> looking up its parts in the Vocabulary to understand what its doing. >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
