I can that you can commit changes to svn, can you explain why you cannot change 
the lablist.txt?

On 19 Sep, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's okay Bill, I've located the one verb I've used in misc.ijs and copied
> it into tte.ijs.
> 
> It works fine now in JQt.
> 
> But to run: tte.ijs -needs this line inserting in lablist.txt:
> Debug;Explicate a given tacit verb;~addons/debug/tte/tte.ijt
> 
>   open '~addons/labs/labs/lablist.txt'   NB. -to do the hand-edit
> 
> but I don't know how to fix lablist.txt via svn.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:33 AM, bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Try load the specific script inside the specific misc folder
>> 
>> require '~addons/.../misc/....ijs'
>> 
>> On 19 Sep, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Further to this, I've uploaded a new addon: 'debug/tte'
>>> 
>>> used like this:
>>>  require 'debug/tte'
>>>  mytacitverb tte
>>> 
>>> Studio > Labs --shows a new lab under Category: Debug:
>>>    Explicate (convert to explicit) a given tacit verb
>>> 
>>> Or you can get some rough'n'ready documentation with:
>>>  ABOUT_tte_
>>> 
>>> At present it only works under j602. When I try it under j64-801 it fails
>>> because:
>>>  require 'misc'
>>> is no longer supported, giving the error: not found:
>>> /Applications/j64-801/bin/misc
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Joe Bogner <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks Ian. trace looks helpful too. I hadn't stumbled upon that yet.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Ian Clark <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Joe Bogner asks:
>>>>> " Is there a utility to generate an explicit definition from a tacit
>>>>> definition?"
>>>>> 
>>>>> There've certainly been attempts at one. There hasn't been any
>> published
>>>>> improvement on this one by Zsban Ambrus:
>>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Scripts/TacitToExplicit
>>>>> ...though I've had an add-on on the stocks, waiting to get properly
>>>> tested
>>>>> for almost a year now. (Sorry... it was low priority.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> I also wrote a "roadmap" a year ago to pull together all the relevant
>>>> stuff
>>>>> on jwiki...
>>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Guides/Tacit_to_explicit_roadmap
>>>>> ...but I notice I didn't finish it (it needs to mention Ambrus's "tte",
>>>> and
>>>>> it's incomplete in "Approach #2").
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Joe Bogner <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm learning the evaluation rules for tacit expressions, since that is
>>>>>> what's commonly posted as solutions. Is there a utility to generate an
>>>>>> explicit definition from a tacit definition?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> For example, to generate a tacit expression from explicit
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 13 : '(+/ y) % # y'
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +/ % #
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is there some routine to expand that out? (I've now learned that its a
>>>>>> fork).  It seems possible that it could expand out to multiple
>> possible
>>>>>> variants -- since as I understand, it's a reduced form. I've looked at
>>>>>> fndisplay but didn't put too much time into it yet since I wasn't sure
>>>>> that
>>>>>> it's what I was looking for.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Along those same lines, j6 shows a representation of an expression in
>>>>> boxes
>>>>>> which I've found to be helpful to understand how an expression is
>>>>> grouped.
>>>>>> I haven't seen that same functionality in j7 or j8. Does it exist?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I find myself spending a fair amount of time taking an expression and
>>>>> then
>>>>>> looking up its parts in the Vocabulary to understand what its doing.
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> For information about J forums see
>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>>>> 
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>>> 
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to